Universitas Scholarium — A Community of Scholars Log In
← All Courses
Tutorial Course

Financial Accounting

Led by Fra Luca de Pacioli Simulacrum

8 modules 8 modules · ~14 hours Accounting & Business Updated yesterday

Eight tutorials on financial accounting at the level of preparing statutory accounts under UK reporting frameworks — IFRS for listed entities, FRS 102 for unlisted — led by Pacioli with Blott on the practical day-to-day mechanics and Dorothy Rigour on accounting policy choice. Covers the conceptual framework, accruals and adjustments, depreciation and impairment, inventory and revenue recognition, financial instruments at introduction level, the statutory account formats under the Companies Act 2006, and the role of notes and accounting policies.

Courses are available to holders of a paid pass or membership. See passes & membership →

The Conceptual Frame…1Accruals, Prepayment…2Property, Plant, Equ…3Inventory, Revenue R…4Liabilities and Prov…5Equity, Reserves, an…6Accounting Policies,…7Statutory Accounts: …8
  1. Module 1 ○ Open

    The Conceptual Framework: Why Standards Exist

    Led by Fra Luca de Pacioli Simulacrum

    The question

    An introduction to the IFRS Conceptual Framework — the IASB's foundation document explaining why financial-reporting standards exist and what they should be aiming for. The module covers the objective of financial reporting (information useful to investors, lenders, and other creditors), the qualitative characteristics (relevance, faithful representation) and enhancing characteristics (comparability, verifiability, timeliness, understandability), the going-concern assumption, the elements of accounts and their recognition criteria, and the relationship between the Framework and specific IFRS standards. The closing scenario asks the student to decide whether a specific item should be recognised under the Framework.

    Outcome

    The student can articulate the objective of financial reporting, name the qualitative characteristics, distinguish them from enhancing characteristics, define the elements of accounts, and explain the relationship between the Conceptual Framework and specific reporting standards. (Conceptual Framework)

    Practice scenarios

    Should This Be Recognised?

    A company is preparing its year-end accounts. Three items are in dispute. (1) The company has filed a £200,000 lawsuit against a supplier and the lawyers think it has a 70% chance of success. Should an asset be recognised? (2) The company has been told it will probably need to pay £80,000 in environmental remediation costs at one of its sites within the next three years, but the precise amount and timing are uncertain. Should a liability be recognised? (3) The company has spent £150,000 developing a new product internally. The product looks promising but has not yet been launched. Should an intangible asset be recognised?

    Your goals

    • For each item, apply the recognition criteria from the Conceptual Framework: does it meet the definition of an asset/liability/asset, and can it be reliably measured?
    • Item 1: probably no — a contingent gain is generally not recognised as an asset under IAS 37 (uncertainty cuts toward conservatism for assets); disclose in the notes.
    • Item 2: yes — provision required under IAS 37 if (a) present obligation, (b) probable outflow, (c) reliable estimate. The £80,000 with three-year timing meets these criteria; recognise a provision.
    • Item 3: maybe — under IAS 38, internally generated intangibles can only be capitalised if specific criteria are met (technical feasibility demonstrated, intention and ability to complete, expected to generate future economic benefits, reliable cost measurement, sufficient resources). If those are not met, expense as incurred. Walk through which criteria apply.
    • Apply the qualitative characteristics: which treatment is more "faithfully representational"? Which is more "comparable" with peers?
  2. Module 2 ○ Open

    Accruals, Prepayments, and the Year-End Adjustments

    Led by Cornelius Blott Simulacrum

    The question

    How a trial balance becomes a set of financial statements through year-end adjustment. The module covers the accruals concept (revenue when earned, expense when incurred, regardless of cash) and the six standard adjustments — accruals, prepayments, accrued income, deferred income, depreciation, and bad debts/provisions — with the journal entries for each. The matching principle in operation, the difference between an accrual and a provision, the year-end stock count, and the role of materiality in deciding which adjustments to make. The closing exercise works through a year-end file.

    Outcome

    The student can identify the six standard adjustments, write the correct journal entry for each, post them to the trial balance, and explain why accruals accounting produces a more representational set of accounts than cash accounting. (Year-end adjustments)

    Practice scenarios

    The Year-End File

    Your company's draft accounts have been produced from the trial balance, but the year-end adjustments have not been made. The financial controller has handed you a list of items requiring judgement. (1) The December electricity bill — estimated at £4,500 — has not yet arrived. (2) The annual insurance premium of £18,000 was paid on 1 October for cover from October to September. (3) A customer was invoiced £25,000 on 28 December but the work is partly still to be done in January (estimate 30% of the work is in January). (4) £8,000 of cash was received on 22 December as a deposit for a project starting in February. (5) The company's vehicles cost £120,000 and are depreciated over four years on a straight-line basis (this is the second year). (6) Of receivables totalling £85,000, one customer owing £6,000 has gone into administration; further £4,000 is over six months overdue and considered doubtful. Write all six adjusting entries and assess the profit impact.

    Your goals

    • Item 1: accrue the £4,500 — Dr Electricity Expense, Cr Accruals.
    • Item 2: prepayment — three months (Oct-Dec) used, nine months (Jan-Sep) prepaid; therefore £13,500 prepaid at year-end. Dr Prepayments £13,500, Cr Insurance Expense £13,500.
    • Item 3: defer 30% of revenue — Dr Revenue £7,500, Cr Deferred Income £7,500 (reducing this year's profit).
    • Item 4: defer £8,000 — already deferred income; the original entry was probably Dr Cash, Cr Deferred Income; check that's how it was recorded and adjust if not.
    • Item 5: depreciation £30,000 — Dr Depreciation Expense £30,000, Cr Accumulated Depreciation £30,000.
    • Item 6: bad debt of £6,000 — Dr Bad Debt Expense £6,000, Cr Receivables £6,000. Doubtful debt provision of £4,000 — Dr Bad Debt Expense £4,000, Cr Provision for Doubtful Debts £4,000.
    • Total profit impact: −£4,500 + £13,500 (saving) − £7,500 − £30,000 − £6,000 − £4,000 = −£38,500 reduction in profit.
  3. Module 3 ○ Open

    Property, Plant, Equipment, and Depreciation

    Led by Fra Luca de Pacioli Simulacrum

    The question

    How long-lived physical assets are accounted for under IAS 16 and FRS 102 Section 17. The module covers the rationale for capitalisation and depreciation (matching principle), the components of cost (purchase price, directly attributable costs, decommissioning), the depreciable amount, the three depreciation methods (straight-line, reducing balance, units of production) and when each fits, journal entries for purchase and disposal, the annual review of useful life and residual value with prospective treatment of changes in estimate under IAS 8, the difference between depreciation and impairment, and component depreciation under IFRS. The closing exercise estimates useful life for a specific asset class.

    Outcome

    The student can record the purchase, depreciation, and disposal of a non-current asset, choose between the three depreciation methods with reasoning, calculate the carrying amount at any point in the asset's life, and recognise a change in estimate prospectively. (PPE and depreciation)

    Practice scenarios

    Estimating Useful Life

    Your company has just acquired a £450,000 piece of manufacturing equipment. The financial controller has asked you to recommend the depreciation policy. The equipment supplier suggests a useful life of seven years; the engineering team thinks ten years if maintained well; a competitor uses five years for similar equipment. The CFO wants the seven-year option because it produces a depreciation charge that matches a banking covenant calculation. The auditor wants ten years because that's what the engineering team says. Your job is to recommend a policy that is technically defensible, not one that is convenient.

    Your goals

    • Identify the issue: useful life is an *estimate*, and the choice has direct profit impact (£450,000 / 5 = £90,000/year vs £450,000 / 10 = £45,000/year — a £45,000 swing on profit).
    • Apply the IAS 16 criterion: useful life is "the period over which an asset is expected to be available for use *by the entity*", which depends on usage intensity, technical obsolescence, legal limits, and physical wear.
    • Recommend evidence-based: use the engineering team's assessment if it's substantive; document the basis; benchmark against industry. Likely answer: seven to ten years, depreciated straight-line, with annual review.
    • Address the CFO's pressure honestly: covenant convenience is *not* a reason to choose a useful life. If the auditor disagrees, the auditor will likely prevail — and they will rightly question why a covenant calculation is driving the policy.
    • Recommend the seven-year choice if (and only if) genuine evidence supports it; otherwise recommend ten with prospective adjustment if conditions change.
  4. Module 4 ○ Open

    Inventory, Revenue Recognition, and Impairment

    Led by Fra Luca de Pacioli Simulacrum

    The question

    Three of the most consequential areas of financial accounting — and three of the most frequently misapplied. The module covers inventory measurement at lower-of-cost-and-NRV (with FIFO, weighted-average, and the LIFO ban under IFRS), the IFRS 15 five-step revenue recognition model with worked examples on long-term contracts and variable consideration, and IAS 36 impairment basics including recoverable amount (higher of fair value less costs of disposal and value in use), impairment indicators, cash-generating units, and the irreversibility of goodwill impairment under IFRS. The closing scenario applies IFRS 15 to a software-licensing contract.

    Outcome

    The student can apply the lower-of-cost-and-NRV rule to inventory, walk through the IFRS 15 five-step model on a real contract, identify the indicators of impairment, and calculate an impairment loss. (Inventory, revenue, impairment)

    Practice scenarios

    The Software Sales Contract

    Your company has just signed a three-year contract with a customer worth £600,000 in total. The structure: £200,000 paid on signing for a one-time software licence; £150,000 for implementation services delivered over three months; £250,000 for three years of support and maintenance, paid £83,333 per year. The CFO wants to recognise as much revenue as possible in the year of signing. Your job is to apply IFRS 15 properly and tell the CFO what is actually defensible.

    Your goals

    • Step 1: identify the contract — three-year, £600,000 total, £200,000 + £150,000 + £250,000.
    • Step 2: identify the performance obligations — three distinct ones: (a) software licence, (b) implementation services, (c) ongoing support. Test for distinctness: each is separately identifiable and capable of being delivered separately.
    • Step 3: determine the transaction price — £600,000 total.
    • Step 4: allocate the price — based on standalone selling prices. If the licence's standalone is £200k, implementation is £150k, support is £250k for three years, the allocation matches the stated prices. If standalone selling prices differ (e.g., the licence is being discounted to win the deal), the £600k must be reallocated proportionately.
    • Step 5: recognise revenue: licence — at a point in time when delivered (Year 1, £200k); implementation services — over three months as performed; support — over three years, on a straight-line basis (£83,333 per year).
    • Total Year 1 revenue: £200k licence + £150k implementation + £83,333 of support = £433,333. Years 2 and 3: £83,333 each.
    • The CFO's preference (recognise the lot in Year 1) is *not defensible* under IFRS 15. The support obligation is satisfied over time, not at signing.
  5. Module 5 ○ Open

    Liabilities and Provisions

    Led by Fra Luca de Pacioli Simulacrum

    The question

    The framework for recognising and measuring liabilities under IAS 37 and FRS 102 Section 21, with particular attention to provisions and contingent liabilities. The module covers the three categories of liabilities (trade and accrued; loans and borrowings at amortised cost; provisions), the three tests for a provision (present obligation from past event, probable outflow, reliable estimate), best estimate as the measurement basis, discounting for long-dated provisions, the special cases (warranties, restructuring, onerous contracts, environmental obligations), and why restructuring provisions are tightly constrained. The closing scenario decides whether a planned restructuring qualifies for provision recognition.

    Outcome

    The student can classify a liability into the correct category, apply the three tests for a provision, distinguish a provision from a contingent liability, calculate the discounted amount of a long-dated provision, and recognise the special cases (warranty, restructuring, onerous contract). (Liabilities)

    Practice scenarios

    The Restructuring Provision

    Your company's CEO announced last week, at the AGM, that the firm intends to "restructure operations to better serve customers in the digital era". No detailed plan exists; no employees have been informed of specific consequences; no contracts have been changed. The CFO wants to recognise a £4 million restructuring provision in the year-end accounts that close in two weeks, on the basis that the announcement creates the obligation. The auditor is sceptical. Your job is to apply IAS 37 to determine whether a provision is justified.

    Your goals

    • Apply the three tests: (a) is there a present obligation from a past event? (b) is outflow probable? (c) can the amount be reliably estimated?
    • For restructuring specifically, IAS 37 requires a *detailed formal plan* identifying at minimum the business or part of business concerned, the principal locations affected, the location-function-and-approximate-number of employees to be compensated for terminating their services, the expenditures to be undertaken, and when the plan will be implemented. *And* the entity must have raised a valid expectation in those affected that it will carry out the restructuring, by starting to implement the plan or announcing its main features to those affected.
    • The current situation: no detailed plan, no employees informed, no implementation started. *No provision can be recognised.*
    • The CEO's announcement at the AGM does not meet the criteria — it is too general, and the affected parties have not been told the specifics.
    • Recommend disclosure as a contingent liability or post-balance-sheet event if material; recognise the provision in the year *after* the detailed plan is in place and communicated.
  6. Module 6 ○ Open

    Equity, Reserves, and Distributions

    Led by Fra Luca de Pacioli Simulacrum

    The question

    The structure of UK company equity and the rules governing distributions to shareholders. The module covers the components (share capital, share premium, retained earnings, revaluation reserve, capital redemption reserve), the share-issue process, the distinction between distributable and non-distributable reserves under Companies Act 2006 Part 23, the directors' obligation to ensure distributable profits before declaring dividends, and the journal entries for share issues, dividends, buy-backs, and revaluation. The statement of changes in equity as the fourth primary statement under IFRS / FRS 102. The closing scenario answers a board's question of whether the dividend can be paid.

    Outcome

    The student can identify the components of UK company equity, distinguish distributable from non-distributable reserves, record the journal entries for share issues, dividends, and buy-backs, prepare a basic statement of changes in equity, and identify the legal constraint on dividend payment. (Equity, reserves, distributions)

    Practice scenarios

    Can We Pay the Dividend?

    The board of a UK private company is preparing to declare an interim dividend of £500,000 to its shareholders. The most recent management accounts show: share capital £100,000, share premium £400,000, retained earnings £350,000, revaluation reserve £200,000, total equity £1,050,000. The CEO believes the dividend is "easily covered" because total equity is over £1 million. The CFO has asked you to confirm whether the dividend can lawfully be paid.

    Your goals

    • Identify the relevant figure: distributable reserves, not total equity.
    • Apply CA 2006 Part 23: distributable profits = accumulated realised profits less accumulated realised losses.
    • The components: share capital is not distributable (creditor protection); share premium is not distributable (s. 610); the revaluation reserve is not distributable (the gain is unrealised). Only retained earnings — and only the realised portion — are available.
    • Available for distribution: £350,000 — *less* than the proposed £500,000.
    • The dividend cannot lawfully be paid at £500,000. The maximum lawful dividend, on these figures, is £350,000.
    • Recommend the board reduce the dividend to £350,000, or wait until additional profits accumulate, or consider a capital reduction (a court-approved process to release some of the share premium account).
    • Warn the directors: paying £500,000 would be an unlawful distribution. The directors would be personally liable to the company for the £150,000 excess; the shareholders could be required to repay it.
  7. Module 7 ○ Open

    Accounting Policies, Estimates, and Errors

    Led by Dorothy Edith Rigour Simulacrum

    The question

    How IAS 8 and FRS 102 Section 10 distinguish three things often confused: an accounting policy (a principle or rule chosen, e.g. cost vs revaluation model for PPE), an accounting estimate (a judgement about an uncertain future, e.g. useful life), and an error (a material misstatement from a past period). The module covers the treatment for changes in each — retrospective application for policy changes and errors, prospective for estimates — the disclosure requirements for significant policies and key estimation uncertainties, and the cases where management may try to recharacterise an estimate as a policy change to alter the accounting effect. The closing scenario picks apart a real example.

    Outcome

    The student can distinguish accounting policy from accounting estimate from error, apply the correct treatment for changes in each, identify the disclosure requirements for significant policies and key estimation uncertainties, and recognise the cases where management may try to recharacterise the type of change. (Policies, estimates, errors)

    Practice scenarios

    Policy or Estimate?

    Your company has been depreciating its production equipment on a straight-line basis over ten years. The new operations director is arguing for a change to seven-year reducing-balance, on the basis that the equipment "actually loses value faster than that, especially in the early years". The CFO is happy because seven-year reducing-balance produces lower profit this year (which helps with a tax planning point) — but the CFO wants to characterise it as an *estimate change* (prospective only, no restatement of comparatives) rather than a *policy change* (retrospective restatement required). Your job is to determine the correct classification and treatment.

    Your goals

    • Identify what is changing. Two things are at stake: (a) the depreciation method (straight-line vs reducing-balance), and (b) the useful life (ten vs seven years).
    • The method is an *accounting policy* — straight-line is a policy, reducing-balance is a different policy. Changing the method is a *policy change*, retrospective.
    • The useful life is an *accounting estimate* — the choice between ten and seven years is a judgement of expected useful life, not a principled difference in how depreciation is calculated. Changing the life is an *estimate change*, prospective.
    • The CFO's position is incorrect. The change in method is a policy change, not just an estimate change.
    • Apply the consequence: under IAS 8, changing the policy requires retrospective restatement of prior-year comparatives, with disclosure of the change and its rationale. Changing the life is prospective, applied from the date of the change.
    • Push back on the CFO honestly: recharacterising the policy change as an estimate change to avoid restatement is incorrect, and the auditor will catch it. Recommend either keeping straight-line and just adjusting the useful life (estimate change, prospective) or changing both as a justified policy revision (with retrospective restatement).
  8. Module 8 ○ Open

    Statutory Accounts: Putting It All Together

    Led by Fra Luca de Pacioli Simulacrum

    The question

    The full set of UK statutory accounts as a structured document. The module covers the components (strategic report, directors' report, four primary statements plus notes, and the audit report when required), the audit thresholds (turnover £10.2m, balance-sheet £5.1m, 50 employees — meet two of three), the small-company and micro-entity regimes (FRS 102 1A, FRS 105), the directors' report content, the strategic-report requirements for medium and large entities, post-balance-sheet events (adjusting vs non-adjusting under IAS 10), and the going-concern statement and what it requires. The closing exercise reviews a draft set of statutory accounts.

    Outcome

    The student can describe the components of a complete set of UK statutory accounts, identify which thresholds determine which regime applies, recognise the role of the directors' report and strategic report, distinguish adjusting from non-adjusting post-balance-sheet events, and articulate the directors' responsibility for the accounts.

    Practice scenarios

    Reviewing a Draft

    You have been given a draft set of statutory accounts for a UK private company (turnover £14m, balance sheet total £8m, 60 employees — therefore subject to full audit). The company has had a difficult year — revenue down 12%, a major customer in administration owing £180k, a planned restructuring that has not yet been formalised, a major regulatory investigation that is not yet concluded. Your job is to review the draft and identify five things that need to be addressed before sign-off.

    Your goals

    • Identify the audit-threshold position: above all three thresholds — full audit required, the auditor's report must be included.
    • Identify the bad-debt issue: the £180k customer in administration probably needs to be written off (not provisioned) — a known loss, not a doubtful debt.
    • Identify the restructuring issue: as in Module 5, no provision can be recognised because there is no detailed formal plan communicated to those affected. Ensure no £-million restructuring charge has been included; if it has, it must be removed.
    • Identify the regulatory investigation: this is a contingent liability — disclose in the notes (nature, uncertainty, possible financial effect or a statement that estimation is impractical), but do not recognise unless an outflow becomes probable and the amount can be reliably estimated.
    • Identify the going-concern question: with revenue down 12% and a major customer in administration, the directors must explicitly assess and confirm the going-concern basis. The auditor will require a robust going-concern paper — cash-flow forecasts for at least twelve months, sensitivity analysis, headroom against banking covenants.
    • Identify the strategic-report content: the principal risks section must address the regulatory investigation (the going-concern adviser will require it) and the customer concentration risk.