Universitas Scholarium — A Community of Scholars Log In
← All Courses
Tutorial Course

GCSE Latin — Themes: Heroes and Villains

Led by Livy Simulacrum

6 modules 6 modules · ~10 hours Classics Updated 2 days ago

Six tutorials on the 2027-2029 WJEC Eduqas GCSE Latin Component 2 theme "Heroes and Villains" — a selection of Latin texts and sources on Romans good and bad — hosted by Livy with rotating guest hosts (Sallust on Catiline, Tacitus and Suetonius on imperial figures) and a final module on the extended evaluative response required by the paper.

Courses are available to holders of a paid pass or membership. See passes & membership →

Roman Virtue: What M…1Heroes of the Early …2Villains of the Late…3Heroes and Villains …4Source Materials: Ho…5The Extended Evaluat…6
  1. Module 1 ○ Open

    Roman Virtue: What Made a Roman "Good"?

    Led by Livy Simulacrum

    The question

    Before we can discuss heroes and villains, we need to understand what the Romans counted as heroic. What is *virtus*, and how did it differ from the Greek equivalent or from modern ideas of virtue?

    Outcome

    The student can articulate the component virtues of *virtus* and their inverses, describe how these frame the hero/villain distinction in Roman culture, and approach specific prescribed texts with the right interpretive categories in mind. (WJEC Component 2 · theme context)

  2. Module 2 ○ Open

    Heroes of the Early Republic

    Led by Livy Simulacrum

    The question

    The early Roman Republic is populated by exemplary figures — Horatius at the bridge, Cincinnatus at the plough, Mucius Scaevola with his hand in the fire. What do these stories do, and why did they matter to later Romans?

    Outcome

    The student can recount the three canonical early-Republican hero stories, identify Livy's stylistic techniques in Latin passages drawn from them, and explain why these figures embodied specific components of *virtus*. (WJEC Component 2 · prose passages from Livy)

  3. Module 3 ○ Open

    Villains of the Late Republic: Sallust on Catiline

    Led by Gaius Sallustius Crispus Simulacrum

    The question

    How does Sallust construct the portrait of Catiline — the aristocrat-turned-revolutionary who tried to overthrow the Republic in 63 BC?

    Outcome

    The student can recognise Sallust's distinctive prose style in Latin passages, describe the portrait he constructs of Catiline and its moral framework, and discuss how a Sallustian villain differs from the heroic exemplars of Livy. (WJEC Component 2 · prose passages from Sallust)

  4. Module 4 ○ Open

    Heroes and Villains of the Early Empire: Tacitus and Suetonius

    Led by Publius Cornelius Tacitus Simulacrum

    The question

    Under the emperors, the hero-villain binary becomes more complicated. What do Tacitus and Suetonius do with figures who have supreme power but whose characters are mixed?

    Outcome

    The student can distinguish Tacitean from Suetonian approaches to imperial biography, identify the rhetorical techniques each uses in Latin passages, and discuss why imperial figures demand more complex moral analysis than Republican heroes and villains. (WJEC Component 2 · passages from Tacitus and Suetonius)

  5. Module 5 ○ Open

    Source Materials: How Images Tell the Story

    Led by Livy Simulacrum

    The question

    The theme includes not just Latin texts but ancient source materials — coins, busts, inscriptions, paintings, mosaics. How do you read a Roman image as evidence?

    Outcome

    The student can analyse a Roman source image rhetorically (commissioner, audience, purpose, choices), relate it to the hero-or-villain framing, and synthesise textual and visual evidence in an answer. (WJEC Component 2 · source materials)

  6. Module 6 ○ Open

    The Extended Evaluative Response

    Led by Livy Simulacrum

    The question

    The paper's highest-mark question asks for a sustained argument drawing on evidence from across the theme. How do you construct one?

    Outcome

    The student can construct an extended evaluative response to a hero-villain question, draw on evidence from multiple authors and source types, engage with Latin passages analytically, and manage the time demands of the paper.