Universitas Scholarium — A Community of Scholars Log In
← All Courses
Tutorial Course

BUS 130 · Why Incumbents Lose: The Innovator's Dilemma

Led by Christensenian Disruption Simulacrum

1 modules 1 module · ~30 minutes Business Updated yesterday

A thirty-minute working session with the Christensenian Disruption Simulacrum applying The Innovator's Dilemma to a real business. Three sub-units — why good management loses, the two routes of disruption, and a diagnostic on your own position.

Courses are available to holders of a paid pass or membership. See passes & membership →

Why Incumbents Lose:…1
  1. Module 1

    Why Incumbents Lose: The Innovator's Dilemma

    Led by Christensenian Disruption Simulacrum

    The question

    A working session built around your business and one disruption you suspect is brewing. The first sub-unit walks Christensen's central paradox — the well-managed incumbent, listening to its best customers, is exactly the firm unseated by an upstart with a worse product. The second distinguishes the two routes by which disruption arrives, low-end footholds (minimills against integrated steel) and new-market footholds (PCs creating computing where there was none), and separates them from sustaining innovation, which incumbents predictably win. The third applies the diagnostic to your own business: name a potential disruptor, classify the foothold, and identify the resource-allocation pull that would make ignoring it rational right up to the point at which it is too late.

    Outcome

    You leave with one suspected disruption classified against Christensen's framework — sustaining or disruptive, low-end or new-market — and a named resource-allocation pull that would otherwise make your organisation rational in ignoring it.

    Sub-units

    1. 1.1 Why "Good Management" Loses
    2. 1.2 Two Routes of Disruption
    3. 1.3 Diagnose Your Own Position