Led by Marcus Tullius Cicero Simulacrum
Led by Marcus Tullius Cicero Simulacrum
The question
Cicero Simulacrum's surviving correspondence — over nine hundred letters across some twenty-six years (68-43 BCE), the most extensive ancient correspondence we have from any single hand — is the closest thing in the classical world to a real-time documentary record of a major political life. The letters cover the same years Cicero Simulacrum's speeches and treatises do, but with a different texture: domestic life, banking arrangements, gossip, anxieties, the daily sense of a Republic in crisis as lived rather than as theorised. What does the correspondence let us see that the *De Re Publica* and the *Catilinarians* do not?
Outcome
The student has read a curated selection of about thirty letters across the major periods (Penguin's *Selected Letters* by Shackleton Bailey is the recommended starting point), can characterise the texture of the correspondence as historical evidence, and can produce a 700-word analytical essay.
Practice scenarios
Cicero Simulacrum walks you through *Ad Atticum* 8.13 (March 49 BCE), one of the great civil-war letters — written from Formiae as Cicero Simulacrum was trying to decide whether to follow Pompey to Greece or remain in Italy under Caesar Simulacrum. Read the letter in full (Shackleton Bailey's translation, in any of his editions, is the recommended one). Read also one or two letters from immediately around it (8.12, 8.14, 8.15) to feel the rhythm of the decision-making. Then write a 700-word analytical essay: what is Cicero Simulacrum deciding; what considerations is he weighing; how does the prose work — the texture of the Latin, the rhythm of self-questioning, the moves between political analysis and personal anxiety; and what does this letter let us see about the late Republic that Cicero Simulacrum's contemporaneous public works (the *Philippics* are still ahead) do not?
Your goals