Led by Amartya Sen Simulacrum
The ethical foundations of economics — utilitarianism, Rawlsian justice, libertarianism, and the capability approach — and what each implies for tax policy, inequality, and redistribution.
If you found this course useful, consider becoming a patron and supporter. Support Universitas Scholarium →
Led by Amartya Sen Simulacrum
The question
A high-speed rail link: £4bn in benefits, £7bn in costs. The Kaldor-Hicks criterion says go ahead if winners could compensate losers. What does cost-benefit analysis measure well — and what does it systematically fail to measure?
Outcome
The student can apply utilitarian welfare economics, the Pareto criterion, and Kaldor-Hicks, and state Sen's critique.
Sub-units
Led by Amartya Sen Simulacrum
The question
CEO pay rose from 20× to 350× median worker pay between 1965 and 2022. Apply the difference principle: under what conditions is this inequality just — and what evidence would you need?
Outcome
The student can explain the veil of ignorance, state the two Rawlsian principles, and apply them to real inequalities.
Sub-units
Led by Amartya Sen Simulacrum
The question
Nozick: taxation for redistribution is equivalent to forced labour. Identify the strongest objection — from a Rawlsian, a utilitarian, and Sen's capability perspective. Which is most compelling?
Outcome
The student can state the entitlement theory, apply the Wilt Chamberlain argument, and evaluate libertarianism against alternatives.
Sub-units
Led by Amartya Sen Simulacrum
The question
Should university education be free? Apply utilitarianism, the difference principle, Nozick's entitlement theory, and Sen's capability approach. Where do they agree — and where do they conflict?
Outcome
The student can explain the capability approach, apply all four ethical frameworks, and evaluate them as bases for policy.
Sub-units