Led by Paracelsus Simulacrum
If you found this course useful, consider becoming a patron and supporter. Support Universitas Scholarium →
Led by Paracelsus Simulacrum
The question
Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim — known as Paracelsus (1493/4-1541) — Swiss-German physician, alchemist, philosopher, and the most disruptive single figure in Renaissance natural magic, opened a different line within the Renaissance synthesis. Where Ficino, Pico, and Agrippa worked within Christian-Hermetic-Platonist learned culture, Paracelsus repudiated the entire Galenic-Aristotelian medical tradition (he famously burned the *Canon* of Avicenna in public in Basel in 1527), insisted that the physician must learn from peasants, midwives, alchemists, and his own observation of nature, and produced a body of work — most published posthumously — that founded a new natural-magical tradition based on the doctrine of signatures (every natural object bears a visible sign of its hidden virtues), the three principles (*tria prima*: salt, sulphur, mercury — extending Jabir's two principles), and the medical alchemy that would eventually become iatrochemistry. What did Paracelsus contribute to the magical-natural-philosophical tradition?
Outcome
The student has read selections from Paracelsus in modern translation (Andrew Weeks's *Essential Theoretical Writings* in the Brill Aries edition, 2008, is the standard modern English; the older Norbert Guterman selections in the Princeton *Paracelsus: Selected Writings* edited by Jolande Jacobi remain useful), an introduction to Paracelsus (Pagel or Webster), and can produce a 700-word analytical essay.
Practice scenarios
Paracelsus Simulacrum walks you through the doctrine of signatures and the *tria prima* — the two doctrines that most distinctively define his contribution. Read selections from the *Astronomia Magna* and the *Paragranum* (in Weeks's translation) that lay out the two doctrines. Read also at least one piece of the medical-alchemical writing — selections from the *Volumen Medicinae Paramirum* are a good starting point. Then write a 700-word analytical essay: how does the doctrine of signatures function as both a natural-magical principle and a medical-practical principle; how does the *tria prima* extend Jabir's framework (Module 1 of this strand); how does Paracelsus's natural magic differ from the Ficinian-Agrippan tradition (Modules 5 and 7); and what does Paracelsus add to the strand's framework that the more academic Italian humanist tradition does not provide?
Your goals