Led by Senior HSE Engineer Simulacrum
Behavioural safety in oil and gas from the ABC behavioural model and human factors through fire hazards, prevention, detection and response, safety culture, communication, regulatory compliance, risk assessment, training, and continuous improvement.
Led by Senior HSE Engineer Simulacrum
The question
Between the procedure and the action stands a human being who may be fatigued, distracted, or overconfident. This module covers the ABC model of behaviour (why consequences drive future behaviour more than antecedents), five common at-risk behaviours in oil and gas (PPE non-compliance, interlock bypass, PTW shortcuts, confined space shortcuts, normalisation of deviance), five human factors (fatigue, complacency, distraction, stress, cognitive bias), the Heinrich triangle linking at-risk behaviours to serious events, leading vs. lagging safety indicators, and building a safety-first mindset through ownership and stop-work authority.
Outcome
The student can apply the ABC model, identify at-risk behaviours, describe five human factors, explain the Heinrich triangle, and distinguish leading from lagging indicators. (Behavioural safety fundamentals)
Sub-units
Led by Senior HSE Engineer Simulacrum
The question
Fire is the most feared hazard — and the products are flammable by nature. This module covers the fire triangle and five fire types (pool, jet, flash, VCE, BLEVE — each with a different mechanism and response), five ignition source controls (hot work permits, electrical area classification Zones 0/1/2, static grounding, hot surface insulation, lightning protection), four fire detection technologies (gas, flame UV/IR, heat, smoke), fire prevention systems (firewater deluge, foam, dry chemical, passive fire protection), and the fire alarm, PA, and muster systems.
Outcome
The student can describe five fire types, describe five ignition controls, describe four detection technologies, describe firewater/foam/PFP systems, and describe the alarm and muster procedure. (Fire hazards, prevention, and detection)
Sub-units
Led by Senior HSE Engineer Simulacrum
The question
The wrong response to a fire can be worse than no response — applying water to a pool fire spreads it, extinguishing a gas jet without isolating the fuel creates an explosive cloud. This module covers the correct response for each fire type, the SDS and key flammable material properties (flash point, autoignition temperature, LEL/UEL), safe storage and transfer practices (grounding, controlled flow, EIV accessibility), evacuation vs. shelter-in-place decision criteria, and portable fire extinguisher selection by fire class with the PASS technique.
Outcome
The student can describe the correct response for each fire type, define flash point and explosive limits, describe safe storage and transfer, explain the evacuation vs. shelter decision, and match extinguisher types to fire classes. (Fire response and emergency procedures)
Sub-units
Led by Senior HSE Engineer Simulacrum
The question
A facility with excellent technical systems and poor safety culture will eventually have a major incident. This module covers the Bradley Curve maturity model (reactive through interdependent), the Hearts and Minds diagnostic, three safety communication methods (toolbox talk, safety observation with coaching, safety meeting), the near-miss reporting system (easy, non-punitive, closed-loop), the OSHA and HSE regulatory frameworks with four enforcement actions, and safety leadership — the five behaviours that build culture (visible presence, safety-first agenda, recognition, system accountability, open-door reporting).
Outcome
The student can describe the Bradley Curve stages, describe three communication methods, describe the near-miss reporting requirements, explain the regulatory audit, and describe five leadership behaviours. (Safety culture, communication, and compliance)
Sub-units
Led by Senior HSE Engineer Simulacrum
The question
Behavioural safety is a continuous improvement cycle — the risk assessment identifies hazards, training equips the workforce, the observation programme measures behaviour, and the review cycle adjusts the programme. This module covers the JSA and the hierarchy of controls (elimination through PPE), the training needs analysis and competency assessment (practical demonstration, not just attendance), the behavioural safety observation programme (observe, record, coach — tracked by the safe behaviour index), continuous improvement (monthly review, annual management review, IOGP benchmarking), and three case studies — Texas City, Piper Alpha, and Deepwater Horizon — analysed for behavioural and cultural failures.
Outcome
The student can conduct a JSA, apply the hierarchy of controls, describe the TNA and competency assessment, describe the observation programme, and identify the behavioural failure in each case study. (Risk assessment, training, and continuous improvement)
Sub-units