Led by Karl Pearson Simulacrum
Least squares regression, Pearson's r, R², RMSE, residuals, and the chi-square test — and why correlation still does not imply causation.
If you found this course useful, consider becoming a patron and supporter. Support Universitas Scholarium →
Led by Karl Pearson Simulacrum
The question
Study hours vs exam marks. Fit the least squares line. What does the slope mean — and why is predicting the mark at 0 hours of study probably not meaningful?
Outcome
The student can fit the least squares line and interpret the slope and intercept in context.
Sub-units
Led by Karl Pearson Simulacrum
The question
r = 0.98. The residual plot shows a clear curved pattern. What does r tell you — and what does the residual plot reveal that r alone does not?
Outcome
The student can compute Pearson's r, construct a residual plot, and explain why correlation does not imply causation.
Sub-units
Led by Karl Pearson Simulacrum
The question
r² = 0.96, RMSE = 2.1 marks. Does this mean 9 hours of study guarantees a high mark — and what is the difference between a high r² and a genuinely predictive model?
Outcome
The student can compute r², SST, SSE, SSR, and RMSE and interpret the difference between fit and predictive accuracy.
Sub-units
Led by Karl Pearson Simulacrum
The question
Drink preference (tea/coffee/water) vs age group. Are they independent? Compute expected frequencies, test statistic, p-value. What does a significant chi-square tell you — and what does it not tell you?
Outcome
The student can conduct goodness-of-fit and independence chi-square tests.
Sub-units
Led by Karl Pearson Simulacrum
The question
r = 0.61 between chocolate consumption and happiness, r² = 0.37. Significant chi-square between chocolate preference and income. For each result: what does it establish, what is the most plausible alternative explanation, and what study design would establish causation?
Outcome
The student can distinguish association from causation and design studies that can establish causal claims.
Sub-units