Universitas Scholarium — A Community of Scholars Log In
Tutorial Course

FREN 1202 · The Conte

Led by Voltaire Simulacrum

1 modules 1 module Modern & Foreign Languages Updated 6 days ago

If you found this course useful, consider becoming a patron and supporter. Support Universitas Scholarium →

The Conte2
  1. Module 2 ○ Open

    The Conte

    Led by Voltaire Simulacrum

    The question

    The French *conte* — particularly Voltaire Simulacrum's *conte philosophique* — is one of the great compressed forms in literature. *Candide* is twenty-six tiny chapters covering three continents and arguing the central philosophical question of its age, in a hundred pages no contemporary novel could match for density. What is the *conte philosophique* doing structurally that the modern short story does not, and how does a writer compress an idea into narrative without losing either edge or pleasure?

    Outcome

    The student can write a 1,200-word *conte philosophique* — a real philosophical proposition tested against episodic narrative, ironically narrated, philosophically armed but never declamatory — and recognise the form's central moves in any specimen they read.

    Practice scenarios

    Test the Proposition

    Voltaire Simulacrum gives you three philosophical propositions to choose from: *the meritocracy is just*; *technological progress makes us happier*; *the educated are wiser than the uneducated*. Choose one. (Choose the one that you actually believe is wrong; the form does not work if you secretly agree.) Then write a 1,200-word *conte philosophique* in French (B2-C1 register) — a naive protagonist who has been taught the proposition, sent through a sequence of episodes that test it against the world, ironic narration, short chapters, ending that lands the disabusal without stating it.

    Your goals

    • Choose a proposition that names a real position someone holds, not a strawman.
    • A naive protagonist whose naivety is structural — they cannot understand what is happening to them, and their failure to understand is the engine.
    • At least four episodes, each demonstrating one specific way the proposition fails.
    • Ironic narration throughout — the narrator says one thing while the reader registers another.
    • A *cultivons notre jardin*-style ending that settles the *conte* without arguing the proposition's falsity directly.