Lesson 158

← Latinum Institute Latin Reading Course

Latinum Institute Latin Reading Course

Lesson 158

158 of 205 lessons

Lesson 158 Classical Latin: A Latinum Institute Language Course

“call” → vocō, vocāre, vocāvī, vocātum - Voice and Summons | #LatinVerbs #ClassicalLanguage

Introduction

The Latin verb vocō, vocāre represents one of the most fundamental acts of human communication: calling out with the voice to summon, name, or invoke. Derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *wekʷ- (”to call, speak”), which also gave rise to Latin vōx (”voice”), this first conjugation verb carries the essential meaning of using one’s voice to reach another person or thing. The etymological connection between vocō (I call) and vōx (voice) reveals the Romans’ understanding that calling is fundamentally a vocal act—an utterance that bridges distance and compels attention.

Unlike English “call,” which has expanded to include telephone calls, bird calls, and numerous metaphorical uses, Latin vocō maintains a tighter focus on three core meanings: (1) summoning someone with the voice, (2) giving a name to something, and (3) invoking or appealing to powers beyond oneself. The verb appears with extraordinary frequency throughout Classical Latin literature—ranking 158th in the Dickinson Core Vocabulary—and is employed by all major authors from Cicero to Vergil. Analysis of authentic texts reveals that Cicero particularly favors vocō in legal and rhetorical contexts (”in iūdicium vocāre” = to summon to trial, “in dubium vocāre” = to call into doubt), while Vergil employs it in elevated epic contexts where gods summon winds and lands call to heroes.

Morphologically, vocō follows the completely regular first conjugation pattern with no irregularities whatsoever: vocō, vocās, vocat in the present; vocābam, vocābās, vocābat in the imperfect; vocāvī, vocāvistī, vocāvit in the perfect; vocātus sum, vocātus es, vocātus est in the perfect passive. This absolute regularity, combined with its high frequency and transparent meaning, makes it an ideal word for understanding both Latin verb mechanics and the Roman worldview of communication. The verb governs the accusative case exclusively, though it frequently appears with prepositional phrases using ad (toward) or in (into) to specify the purpose or destination of the calling.

Key Takeaways

• Vocō derives from PIE *wekʷ- and shares its root with vōx (”voice”), emphasizing the vocal nature of calling • Three core meanings: (1) summon with voice, (2) name/designate, (3) invoke/appeal to • Completely regular first conjugation—no irregular forms in any tense or mood • Common constructions verified in classical texts: vocō + acc (simple), vocō + acc + acc (naming), vocō + ad + acc (purpose) • High frequency in Classical authors (especially Cicero’s speeches and Vergil’s Aeneid) reflects centrality to Roman communication • English derivatives include “vocal,” “vocabulary,” “vocation,” “invoke,” “revoke,” “provoke,” and “convocation”

Index of All Latinum Institute Lessons

✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾ ✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾ ✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾

Section A: Interlinear Construed Text

1.1a Tē vocō. 1.1b tē (teː) you | vocō (ˈwo.koː) I-call

1.2a Mārcus mē vocat. 1.2b Mārcus (ˈmaːr.kʊs) Marcus | mē (meː) me | vocat (ˈwo.kat) calls

1.3a Pater fīlium vocat. 1.3b pater (ˈpa.tɛr) father | fīlium (ˈfiː.li.ʊm) son | vocat (ˈwo.kat) calls

1.4a Amīca nōmen meum vocat. 1.4b amīca (a.ˈmiː.ka) friend-fem | nōmen (ˈnoː.mɛn) name | meum (ˈmɛ.ʊm) my | vocat (ˈwo.kat) calls

1.5a Magister discipulōs in scholam vocat. 1.5b magister (ma.ˈɡɪs.tɛr) teacher | discipulōs (dɪs.ˈkɪ.pʊ.loːs) students | in (ɪn) into | scholam (ˈsko.lam) school | vocat (ˈwo.kat) calls

1.6a Ad cēnam amīcōs hodiē vocāmus. 1.6b ad (ad) to | cēnam (ˈkeː.nam) dinner | amīcōs (a.ˈmiː.koːs) friends | hodiē (hɔ.ˈdɪ.eː) today | vocāmus (wo.ˈkaː.mʊs) we-call

1.7a Cīvēs ad arma cōnsul vocat. 1.7b cīvēs (ˈkiː.weːs) citizens | ad (ad) to | arma (ˈar.ma) arms | cōnsul (ˈkõː.sʊl) consul | vocat (ˈwo.kat) calls

1.8a Rēx mīlitēs ad sē vocāvit. 1.8b rēx (reːks) king | mīlitēs (ˈmiː.lɪ.teːs) soldiers | ad (ad) to | sē (seː) himself | vocāvit (wo.ˈkaː.wɪt) called

1.9a Puerī ā mātre vocātī sunt. 1.9b puerī (ˈpʊ.ɛ.riː) boys | ā (aː) by | mātre (ˈmaː.trɛ) mother | vocātī (wo.ˈkaː.tiː) called | sunt (sʊnt) are

1.10a Agricola servum nōmine Dāvum vocat. 1.10b agricola (ag.ˈrɪ.kɔ.la) farmer | servum (ˈsɛr.wʊm) slave | nōmine (ˈnoː.mɪ.nɛ) by-name | Dāvum (ˈdaː.wʊm) Davus | vocat (ˈwo.kat) calls

✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾ ✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾ ✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾

Section B: Natural Sentences with Translation

1.1 Tē vocō. “I call you.”

1.2 Mārcus mē vocat. “Marcus calls me.”

1.3 Pater fīlium vocat. “The father calls his son.”

1.4 Amīca nōmen meum vocat. “My friend calls my name.”

1.5 Magister discipulōs in scholam vocat. “The teacher calls the students into the school.”

1.6 Ad cēnam amīcōs hodiē vocāmus. “Today we invite friends to dinner.”

1.7 Cīvēs ad arma cōnsul vocat. “The consul calls the citizens to arms.”

1.8 Rēx mīlitēs ad sē vocāvit. “The king summoned the soldiers to himself.”

1.9 Puerī ā mātre vocātī sunt. “The boys were called by their mother.”

1.10 Agricola servum nōmine Dāvum vocat. “The farmer calls the slave by the name Davus.”

1.11 Senātōrēs in cūriam ā tribūnō convocātī erant. “The senators had been summoned into the senate house by the tribune.”

1.12 Nōs omnēs ad bellum fortūna vocat. “Fortune calls us all to war.”

1.13 Fīdem eius nēmō in dubium vocāre potest. “No one can call his trustworthiness into doubt.”

1.14 Hanc urbem Rōmam maiōrēs nostrī vocāvērunt. “Our ancestors called this city Rome.”

1.15 Testēs in iūdicium ā iūdice vocābuntur crās. “The witnesses will be summoned to trial by the judge tomorrow.”

✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾ ✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾ ✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾

Section C: Latin Text Only

1.1 Tē vocō.

1.2 Mārcus mē vocat.

1.3 Pater fīlium vocat.

1.4 Amīca nōmen meum vocat.

1.5 Magister discipulōs in scholam vocat.

1.6 Ad cēnam amīcōs hodiē vocāmus.

1.7 Cīvēs ad arma cōnsul vocat.

1.8 Rēx mīlitēs ad sē vocāvit.

1.9 Puerī ā mātre vocātī sunt.

1.10 Agricola servum nōmine Dāvum vocat.

1.11 Senātōrēs in cūriam ā tribūnō convocātī erant.

1.12 Nōs omnēs ad bellum fortūna vocat.

1.13 Fīdem eius nēmō in dubium vocāre potest.

1.14 Hanc urbem Rōmam maiōrēs nostrī vocāvērunt.

1.15 Testēs in iūdicium ā iūdice vocābuntur crās.

✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾ ✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾ ✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾

Section D: Grammar Rules

These are the grammar rules for vocō in Classical Latin:

Conjugation Pattern

Vocō belongs to the first conjugation and follows the regular -āre pattern without any irregularities. Its four principal parts are: vocō (I call), vocāre (to call), vocāvī (I called/have called), vocātum (called/having been called).

Present System (Present, Imperfect, Future): -

Present Active: vocō, vocās, vocat, vocāmus, vocātis, vocant -

Imperfect Active: vocābam, vocābās, vocābat, vocābāmus, vocābātis, vocābant -

Future Active: vocābō, vocābis, vocābit, vocābimus, vocābitis, vocābunt -

Present Passive: vocor, vocāris, vocātur, vocāmur, vocāminī, vocantur -

Imperfect Passive: vocābar, vocābāris, vocābātur, vocābāmur, vocābāminī, vocābantur -

Future Passive: vocābor, vocāberis, vocābitur, vocābimur, vocābiminī, vocābuntur

Perfect System (Perfect, Pluperfect, Future Perfect): -

Perfect Active: vocāvī, vocāvistī, vocāvit, vocāvimus, vocāvistis, vocāvērunt -

Pluperfect Active: vocāveram, vocāverās, vocāverat, vocāverāmus, vocāverātis, vocāverant -

Future Perfect Active: vocāverō, vocāveris, vocāverit, vocāverimus, vocāveritis, vocāverint -

Perfect Passive: vocātus sum, vocātus es, vocātus est, vocātī sumus, vocātī estis, vocātī sunt -

Pluperfect Passive: vocātus eram, vocātus erās, vocātus erat, vocātī erāmus, vocātī erātis, vocātī erant -

Future Perfect Passive: vocātus erō, vocātus eris, vocātus erit, vocātī erimus, vocātī eritis, vocātī erunt

Subjunctive Mood: -

Present Active: vocem, vocēs, vocet, vocēmus, vocētis, vocent -

Imperfect Active: vocārem, vocārēs, vocāret, vocārēmus, vocārētis, vocārent -

Perfect Active: vocāverim, vocāverīs, vocāverit, vocāverimus, vocāveritis, vocāverint -

Pluperfect Active: vocāvissem, vocāvissēs, vocāvisset, vocāvissēmus, vocāvissētis, vocāvissent

Participles: -

Present Active: vocāns, vocantis (calling) -

Perfect Passive: vocātus, -a, -um (having been called, summoned) -

Future Active: vocātūrus, -a, -um (about to call)

Infinitives: -

Present Active: vocāre (to call) -

Present Passive: vocārī (to be called) -

Perfect Active: vocāvisse (to have called) -

Perfect Passive: vocātus esse (to have been called) -

Future Active: vocātūrus esse (to be about to call)

Syntax and Case Government

Vocō is a transitive verb that governs the accusative case. It appears in several distinct syntactic patterns:

Basic Pattern: vocō + accusative (direct object) -

Example: tē vocō (I call you), Mārcum vocat (he calls Marcus) -

This is the most common construction, used for simple summons

Double Accusative (Naming): vocō + accusative (person/thing) + accusative (name/epithet) -

Example: urbem Rōmam vocāvērunt (they called the city Rome) -

Example from Vergil: saxa vocant Italī ārās (the Italians call the rocks altars) -

This construction assigns a name or designation to something

Prepositional Phrases: -

vocō + ad + accusative: indicates purpose or destination -

ad cēnam vocāre (to invite to dinner) -

ad arma vocāre (to call to arms) -

ad sē vocāre (to summon to oneself) -

vocō + in + accusative: indicates entry into a state or location -

in iūdicium vocāre (to summon to trial) -

in dubium vocāre (to call into doubt - metaphorical) -

in suspīciōnem vocāre (to bring under suspicion)

Passive Constructions: -

When passive, vocō commonly appears with a nominative predicate for naming -

Example: ager Sabīnus vocātur (the field is called Sabine) -

Example: vocātus sum (I have been called/summoned) -

The perfect passive participle vocātus is often used substantively: vocātī (the summoned ones, those who have been called)

Common Compounds

Vocō forms numerous compounds with prefixes, all following first conjugation patterns: -

advocō (call to, summon for help, especially legal) -

convocō (call together, assemble, convene) -

ēvocō (call out, summon forth) -

invocō (call upon, invoke, appeal to) -

prōvocō (call forth, challenge, provoke) -

revocō (call back, recall, revoke)

Common Mistakes

Incorrect Case Usage: Students sometimes use dative instead of accusative. Remember that vocō always takes accusative for the person/thing being called. Incorrect: tibi vocō → Correct: tē vocō.

Double Accusative Confusion: When using the naming construction, both nouns must be in the accusative. Incorrect: urbem Rōma vocāvērunt → Correct: urbem Rōmam vocāvērunt.

Prepositional Phrase Errors: The preposition ad takes accusative, not ablative. Incorrect: ad cēnā vocāre → Correct: ad cēnam vocāre.

Perfect Stem Mistakes: The perfect stem is vocāv-, not vocā-. Incorrect: vocāī → Correct: vocāvī.

Passive Participle Agreement: The perfect passive participle must agree with its subject in gender, number, and case. Incorrect: puella vocātus est → Correct: puella vocāta est.

✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾ ✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾ ✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾

Section E: Cultural Context

Frequency and Register in Classical Latin

Vocō appears with exceptional frequency in Classical Latin texts, ranking 158th among the 1000 most common Latin words. This high frequency reflects its centrality to Roman social, legal, political, and religious life. The verb appears across all registers—from formal oratory and epic poetry to everyday conversation and legal documents. Cicero employs it extensively in his speeches and philosophical works, while Vergil uses it to dramatic effect in the Aeneid. The verb’s versatility made it indispensable for Roman writers describing everything from dinner invitations to divine interventions.

Semantic Range and Usage Contexts

The Romans used vocō in three primary contexts. First, for direct summons—calling someone to come to you, whether a slave being summoned by a master, soldiers being called to assembly, or senators being convened for a meeting. Second, for naming and designation—the act of assigning a name to a person, place, or thing (urbem Rōmam vocāvērunt, “they called the city Rome”). Third, for invocation—appealing to gods, fate, or abstract powers, a usage particularly common in religious contexts and elevated poetry.

In legal contexts, vocō became a technical term. The phrase in iūs vocāre (to summon to court) was the formal legal expression for initiating litigation. Similarly, in iūdicium vocāre meant to summon before a tribunal. These phrases appear throughout Cicero’s forensic speeches and in Roman legal texts.

Social and Political Dimensions

Roman social life centered around networks of obligation and patronage, and vocō played a crucial role in maintaining these relationships. The phrase ad cēnam vocāre (to invite to dinner) represented not merely social courtesy but an important gesture of friendship and political alliance. Refusing such an invitation could damage relationships. Similarly, ad sē vocāre (to summon to oneself) often implied a display of authority or patronage—a powerful individual calling lesser ones into their presence.

In military contexts, ad arma vocāre (to call to arms) was the standard expression for mobilizing troops. Generals and magistrates used this phrase to summon citizens to military service, and it appears throughout Caesar’s Commentarii de Bello Gallico and other military narratives.

Metaphorical and Rhetorical Uses

Roman orators, especially Cicero, developed sophisticated metaphorical uses of vocō. The phrase in dubium vocāre (to call into doubt) became a standard rhetorical device for questioning someone’s credibility or the validity of an argument. Similarly, in invidiam vocāre (to bring into hatred/unpopularity) described the act of making someone odious to the public—a powerful political weapon in Republican Rome.

Poets, particularly Vergil, personified abstract forces as calling or summoning. In the Aeneid, winds call to sails (aurae vēla vocant), lands call to heroes (quae mē cumque vocant terrae, “whatever lands call me”), and fate summons mortals to their destinies. This poetic usage elevated vocō beyond mere physical calling to suggest destiny, compulsion, and the will of greater powers.

Religious and Ritual Contexts

In Roman religion, invocāre (to invoke) was the technical term for calling upon gods in prayer or ritual. The act of “calling” the gods’ names and epithets correctly was considered essential for effective prayer. Similarly, ēvocāre had a specialized religious meaning: the ritual calling forth of enemy gods to abandon a besieged city and come to Rome—a practice called ēvocātiō.

Evolution and Influence

Vocō passed into all Romance languages, giving French voquer (archaic), Italian vocare (archaic, literary), Spanish vocar (archaic), and numerous derivatives. More importantly, it generated a vast family of English words through borrowing at different historical periods: vocal, vocabulary, vocation, invoke, revoke, provoke, convocation, evoke, advocate, and many others. Each borrowing preserved a particular aspect of the Latin verb’s rich semantic range, distributing its meanings across multiple English words where Latin used one highly productive root.

✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾ ✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾ ✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾

Section F: Literary Citation from Vergil’s Aeneid

F-A: Detailed Interlinear Analysis

Aeneid 1.130-131 (Neptune summons the winds)

F-B: Natural Text with Translation

Aeneid 1.130-131 Eurum ad sē Zephyrumque vocat, dehinc talia fātur: “He calls Eurus and Zephyrus to himself, then speaks such words:”

Aeneid 1.609 semper honōs nōmenque tuum laudēsque manēbunt, quae mē cumque vocant terrae. “Forever your honor and name and praises will remain, whatever lands call me.”

Aeneid 1.108 saxa vocant Italī mediīs quae in fluctibus ārās “The Italians call the rocks, which [stand] in the middle of the waves, altars”

F-C: Original Latin Only

Aeneid 1.130-131 Eurum ad sē Zephyrumque vocat, dehinc talia fātur:

Aeneid 1.609 semper honōs nōmenque tuum laudēsque manēbunt, quae mē cumque vocant terrae.

Aeneid 1.108 saxa vocant Italī mediīs quae in fluctibus ārās

F-D: Vocabulary and Grammar Notes

Passage 1 (Aeneid 1.130-131): Neptune Summons the Winds -

Eurum: accusative of Eurus, the East Wind, personified as a deity -

ad sē: prepositional phrase, “to himself”—Neptune summons the winds into his presence -

Zephyrumque: -que = “and”; Zephyrus is the West Wind -

vocat: 3rd sg. present active indicative; subject is Neptune (understood from context) -

dehinc: adverb, “thereafter, then” -

talia: neuter plural accusative, “such things” -

fātur: 3rd sg. present deponent, “speaks” (deponent verb—passive form, active meaning)

Grammatical Analysis: This passage demonstrates the pattern vocō + accusative + ad + accusative, where Neptune summons specific divine beings (Eurum Zephyrumque) to himself (ad sē). The compound object shows how vocō can take multiple accusatives connected by -que. The verb appears in a narrative context, describing divine action.

Passage 2 (Aeneid 1.609): Aeneas Pledges Eternal Gratitude -

semper: adverb, “always, forever” -

honōs nōmenque: subjects of manēbunt; -que = “and” -

tuum: possessive adjective modifying nōmen, “your” -

laudēsque: another subject joined by -que, “praises” -

manēbunt: 3rd pl. future active, “will remain” -

quae...terrae: relative clause; quae = relative pronoun, “which” -

mē: accusative, direct object of vocant -

cumque: enclitic particle attached to relative, “ever, soever” -

vocant: 3rd pl. present active indicative, “call” -

terrae: nominative plural, subject of vocant, “lands”

Grammatical Analysis: This passage shows poetic word order (hyperbaton) with quae mē cumque vocant terrae = “whatever lands call me.” The normal prose order would be quaecumque terrae mē vocant. Vergil separates mē from terrae to create suspense and emphasize both the speaker and the lands. The phrase expresses the hero’s destiny—wherever he is summoned, Dido’s memory will follow.

Passage 3 (Aeneid 1.108): Naming the Dangerous Rocks -

saxa: neuter plural accusative, direct object of vocant, “rocks” -

vocant: 3rd pl. present active indicative, “call, name” -

Italī: nominative plural, subject of vocant, “the Italians” -

mediīs...in fluctibus: prepositional phrase with adjective, “in the middle waves” -

quae: neuter plural relative pronoun referring to saxa -

ārās: accusative plural (second accusative with vocant), “altars”

Grammatical Analysis: This passage exemplifies the double accusative construction for naming: vocant saxa ārās = “they call the rocks altars.” Vergil uses tmesis (splitting a phrase) by inserting mediīs quae in fluctibus between saxa and ārās. The naming reflects Italian sailors’ practice of calling dangerous rocks “altars” because so many ships were wrecked there as if sacrificed.

F-E: Literary and Cultural Commentary

These three passages from Vergil’s Aeneid showcase the full range of vocō‘s usage in epic poetry. In the first passage (1.130-131), Neptune, god of the sea, summons the East and West winds after discovering that they have caused a storm without his permission. The verb vocat here carries divine authority—Neptune’s “calling” is a command that cannot be refused. The structure ad sē...vocat emphasizes the god’s authority: he summons the winds into his presence to rebuke them. This passage demonstrates how vocō can express hierarchical relationships, particularly when a superior summons inferiors.

The second passage (1.609) comes from Aeneas’s first speech to Dido, queen of Carthage, after she has offered refuge to the shipwrecked Trojans. Aeneas pledges eternal gratitude, saying that Dido’s honor will remain with him “whatever lands call me” (quae mē cumque vocant terrae). Here vocō takes on a metaphorical, almost mystical quality—lands do not literally “call” with voices, but the phrase suggests destiny, fate, and the wanderer’s relationship to places that summon him. This personification of geography as an active agent reflects epic poetry’s elevation of all elements of the story to dramatic significance. The phrase also foreshadows Aeneas’s fated journey to Italy, the land that truly “calls” him.

The third passage (1.108) describes treacherous rocks in the Mediterranean that Italian sailors call “altars” (ārās). The double accusative construction (saxa vocant...ārās) demonstrates how Romans conceptualized naming as a form of calling—to give something a name is to “call” it by that name. The dark irony of calling deadly rocks “altars” reflects sailors’ grim humor: these rocks receive “sacrifices” of wrecked ships and drowned men. Vergil’s attention to what “the Italians call” (Italī vocant) these rocks shows his interest in geographical and ethnographical detail, grounding his mythological epic in real Mediterranean topography.

Together, these passages reveal how vocō functioned in Roman epic: to show divine command, to express human destiny and displacement, and to record the names by which people marked their world. The verb bridges the human and divine realms, connects mortals to their fates, and records the human act of imposing meaning on nature through naming.

✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾ ✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾ ✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾

Narrative Section: Historical Dialogue - Caesar Summons His Legates

✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾ ✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾ ✾ ❦ ✾ ❦ ✾

About This Course

This lesson is part of the Latinum Institute’s systematic approach to Latin language acquisition through the Dickinson Core Vocabulary, a carefully curated list of the 1,000 most frequent words in Classical Latin literature. By mastering these high-frequency words in order, students build a robust foundation for reading authentic Latin texts from Cicero, Vergil, Caesar, Ovid, and other canonical authors.

The Dickinson Core Vocabulary is based on rigorous corpus analysis of classical texts, ensuring that every word taught appears frequently across genres and authors. Vocō, ranking 158th, exemplifies the kind of essential vocabulary that appears in virtually every type of Latin text—from political speeches to epic poetry, from legal documents to philosophical dialogues.

Each lesson in this series follows a consistent pedagogical structure: -

Interlinear analysis with word-by-word parsing, pronunciation (IPA), and glosses -

Natural sentences progressing from simple to complex structures -

Latin-only texts for reading practice without translation support -

Comprehensive grammar covering all forms, constructions, and usage patterns -

Cultural context explaining how Romans actually used the word -

Authentic literary examples from major classical authors with detailed analysis

This multi-layered approach ensures that students not only memorize vocabulary but understand how words function in real Latin texts. By combining systematic grammar instruction with authentic examples from Cicero and Vergil, students develop both technical competence and literary appreciation.

The Latinum Institute believes in learning Latin through Latin itself. Rather than relying on translation exercises that privilege English, our method emphasizes direct comprehension of Latin texts through graduated reading, extensive vocabulary building, and immersion in classical literature. For more information about our complete language program, visit our full course index.

We encourage students to read our Trustpilot reviews to learn how our methodology has helped thousands of learners achieve fluency in reading Classical Latin. The systematic, vocabulary-focused approach pioneered by the Latinum Institute has proven successful for students of all backgrounds, from complete beginners to advanced scholars seeking to refine their command of the language.

◊ᴹᴱᴹᴼᴿʸ⁻ᶜᴼᴹᴾᴸᴱᵀᴱ

---

← Lesson 157 ↩ Course Index Lesson 159 →